Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue SUPP_I, 12.  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wade, R.H.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, P. B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wade, R.H.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, P. B. M.

British Orthopaedic Research Society

Southampton – 24–25 September, 2001

President – Professor D Marsh

THE MEASUREMENT OF POLAR FRACTURE STIFFNESS

R.H. Wade; C. I. Moorcroft; P. J. Ogrodnik; and P. B. M. Thomas

Department of Academic Orthopaedics, North Staffs Royal Infirmary, Stoke-on-Trent

Fracture bending stiffness of 15 Nm/° measured in the sagittal plane provides an objective end-point for healing in tibial fractures treated with external fixation (1). Fracture stiffness in other planes has been shown to be significantly different (2). A method for measuring three-dimensional fracture stiffness has been developed (3) and refined. This study describes the results of omni-planar stiffness measurements.

A series of omniplanar fracture stiffness measurements were undertaken on patients with tibial fractures treated by external fixation. The first measurements were performed when the fracture was deemed sufficiently stiff to allow the fixator to be removed safely. These were continued at regular intervals until union, defined as a uniplanar stiffness of greater than 15Nm/° in at least two planes.

Polar stiffness plots were obtained and analysed. The stiffness envelope varied significantly in all planes but the general shape of the polar plot remained the same with successive tests, with an overall increase in stiffness. The polar stiffness measurements were significantly different than concurrent uniplanar measurements; this reflects the difficulty in defining the plane of bending accurately in uniplanar measurements. The fracture configuration and healing fibula had unpredictable effects on the polar stiffness.

The measurement of polar fracture stiffness polar gives new insight into how the mechanical environment of a fracture changes during healing. Fracture stiffness is not uniform and this may have implications on when it is safe to remove the fixator.

Abstracts prepared by Dr P E Watkins, Hodgkin Building, Guys Campus, King’s College London.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General