Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue SUPP_I, 13.  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muller, S.D.
Right arrow Articles by McCaskie, A.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Muller, S.D.
Right arrow Articles by McCaskie, A.W.

British Orthopaedic Research Society


Southampton – 24–25 September, 2001

President – Professor D Marsh


THE DYNAMIC VOLUMETRIC BEHAVIOUR OF POLYMERISING POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE BONE CEMENT

S.D. Muller; S.M. Green; and A.W. McCaskie

Department of Orthopaedics, The Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne

Polymerisation of PMMA results in a volume change resulting from molecular rearrangement. The calculated maximal volume reduction is approximately 7.6%; however, void growth reduces this to 3–6%. The significance of volume reduction is controversial, in particular with reference to void elimination techniques. Whilst the impact of mixing technique on overall volume change is known, little is understood about the dynamic volumetric changes occurring during the crucial time of cement-bone micro-interlock formation. This study aimed to investigate the volumetric behaviour of bone cement during polymerisation.

Polyethylene tubes were modified to simulate the physical and dimensional constraints of the human femoral medullary canal. The tubes were filled with either hand or enhanced vacuum mixed cement and suspended in a water bath. The residual weight of the cement specimen in water was recorded at 60sec intervals for 30 minutes. The dry weight of the cement is known and the immersed weight can be calculated. Archimedes principal allows calculation of the density and thus the volume of the cement mass throughout polymerisation. The specimens were sectioned, stained and analysed to assess sectional porosity.

In no specimen was it possible to demonstrate overall net expansion, however, hand mixed specimens demonstrated a temporary period of expansion during the early exothermic period. Vacuum mixed specimens demonstrated progressive contraction only. Overall volume change correlated closely with sectional porosity.

The overall volume reduction is strongly influenced by porosity. The temporary expansion observed in porous cement specimens must result from temperature driven growth of voids. This expansion occurs during the crucial period of cement-bone micro-interlock formation, and may therefore enhance attempts at pressurisation. Conversely, progressive volume reduction, as seen with low porosity cement, may impede micro-interlock formation. Successful cementation using vacuum mixed cement may therefore be solely dependent on adequate cement pressurisation.

Abstracts prepared by Dr P E Watkins, Hodgkin Building, Guys Campus, King’s College London.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General