Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue SUPP_I, 19-20.  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Topliss, C.J.
Right arrow Articles by Webb, J.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Topliss, C.J.
Right arrow Articles by Webb, J.M.

British Orthopaedic Association/Japanese Orthopaedic Association Combined Congress


London – 3–6 October, 2000

Presidents – Mr Hugh Phillips (BOA) and Professor Takahide Kurokawa (JOA)


TUNNEL POSITION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

C.J. Topliss; and J.M. Webb

Flat 6, Oakleigh House, Bridge Road, Leigh Woods, Bristol, BS8 2PB

Tunnel placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the single most important variable that a surgeon can control in order to achieve a successful outcome. The femoral tunnel is more critical than the tibial.

Audit tunnel positions after ACL reconstruction in a regional centre.We studied 114 patients undergoing primary isolated ACL reconstruction within a 12-month period. Case notes and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively. Tunnel position was assessed on lateral and AP radiographs of the knee. A review of literature established optimal tunnel position. Measurements of tunnel position were made according to the methods described by Jonsson.

16 surgeons (8 consultants and 8 registrars) performed 57 arthroscopic and 57 open reconstructions, using 24 hamstring and 90 bone-tendon-bone autografts. Femoral tunnel drilling was through the medial arthroscopic portal (24) or the tibial tunnel (90). 85 sets of radiographs were available for review (21 not performed post-operatively, 8 not found)

In the sagittal plane, the femoral tunnel insertion should be within the posterior third along an extended Blumensaat’s line and the tibial tunnel between 41 and 49% along the tibial joint line from anterior to posterior. In the coronal plane, the tibial tunnel should exit between 41% and 49% along the tibial joint line, from medially. Our results showed that 65% of femoral tunnels were outside this position, 23% of the tibial tunnels out in the sagittal plane and 55% out coronally. Of those drilled through the medial portal, only 5% of the femoral tunnels were outside our recommended position.

Clinical Governance demands that guidelines for best practice are established and that audit ensures these standards are met. Anatomical studies give useful data in determining acceptable standards, as demonstrated in our audit. To enable this it is imperative that post-operative radiographic assessment is performed routinely.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General