Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue SUPP_II, 102.  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rigby, M C
Right arrow Articles by Ross, A C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rigby, M C
Right arrow Articles by Ross, A C

British Orthopaedic Association

Birmingham – 12–14 September, 2001

President – Professor Charles Galasko

ALLOGRAFT SIZE AND IMPACTION FORCE IN REVISION HIP ARTHROPLASTY

M C Rigby; A Miles; and A C Ross

71 The Common, Broughton Gifford, Melksham, Wiltshire SN12 8NE

It is well known that the integrity of the bone cement interface is crucial for the long-term survival of a primary total hip arthroplasty (THR). Revision THR with impaction bone grafting has recently offered a solution to gross bone loss due to osteolysis. As graft becomes incorporated, clearly the bone graft/cement interface is as crucial as the equivalent interface in primary THR.

The aim of this study was to examine factors that influence this interface. The effects of bone particle size, cement mixing time, and impaction force were examined.

The study was designed to mimic clinical practice. Fresh femoral heads were harvested from primary THR. These were morcelised into large and small particles. The bone was impacted into a purpose built jig with measured force. Cement was pressurised onto the dried surface of the impacted bone after measured mixing times. Cement pressurisation was measured. The cement/graft specimen was extracted and transected with a band saw. Cement penetration was measured with digital image analysis.

Large fragment size was 29 mm², and small was 7. 1mm². Light impaction was 2. 2 Atm. Medium and heavy were 2. 6 Atm. and 3. 2 Atm. respectively. Cement penetration was inversely proportional to impaction force. Cement mixing time also significantly affected cement penetration. Particle size had no effect.

Allograft should be adequately but not excessively impacted, to allow good cement incursion. Cement should be introduced and pressurised perhaps as early as two minutes. Fragment size does not affect cement penetration.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General