Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue SUPP_II, 102.  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patil, S
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Patil, S
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, R

British Orthopaedic Association


Birmingham – 12–14 September, 2001

President – Professor Charles Galasko


HYPONATRAEMIA AND OUTCOME FOLLOWING HIP FRACTURE

S Patil; and R Shaw

59 Methuen Rd, Paisley PA3 4GU

It has been recently suggested that hyponatraemia may be a cause of significant iatrogenic harm in orthopaedic patients. In an attempt to test this theory, this observational study was done to establish the incidence of post-operative hyponatraemia following hip fracture and evaluate its correlation with outcome.

An observational study was carried out on 213 consecutive hip fracture patients. 201 patients completed the requirements of the study (Male-45, Female-156). Mean age was 80 years. Serum sodium concentrations were recorded during the first week of admission. Hyponatraemia defined as significant (Na <130mmol/L) was identified in 9% at admission and 18% during first week of stay. Incidence of severe hyponatraemia was 3%. There were no acute complications of hyponatraemia in these patients. 78% of hyponatraemia patients had received 5% Dextrose infusion during the postoperative period as their main intravenous fluid. All hyponatraemic patients had their sodium levels restored to normal during their stay.

Long term outcome measures used were mortality, change in residential status, walking ability and use of walking aids at 4 months following fracture. There was 20% mortality at 4 months in the hyponatraemic group and it was 30% in the normal serum sodium group. However this difference was not statistically significant. Hyponatraemia did not significantly influence deterioration in residential status (p<0. 05), walking independence (p<0. 05) or increase of walking aids (p<0. 05).

In hip fracture patients, hyponatraemia whilst common was not associated with a poor outcome and at the same time we did not find any evidence of lapse in the recognition and treatment of hyponatraemia in a general orthopaedic ward. However emphasis should be made to junior medical staff to avoid iatrogenic hyponatraemia by following a proper postoperative fluid regime.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General