This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bentley, G Articles by Pringle, J Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bentley, G Articles by Pringle, J

ARTICULAR CARTILAGE REPAIR IN THE YOUNG ADULT KNEE – A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION VS MOSAICPLASTY

The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 4LP

Mosaicplasty¹ and Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation² (ACI) are both modern cartilage repair techniques used to repair symptomatic articular cartilage defects in the knee, based on small osteochondral grafts and cultured chondrocytes respectively. The aim is the restoration of articular cartilage, but until now there is no data comparing the two methods.

100 consecutive patients aged 15–45 with a symptomatic articular cartilage lesion in the knee suitable for cartilage repair were randomised at arthroscopic assessment to undergo either mosaicplasty or ACI. 42 patients underwent mosaicplasty, 58 had ACI. Mean age at time of surgery was 31 years and the average defect size 4. 66 cm².

46% of the defects were post-traumatic, 19% had osteochondritis dissecans, 14% had chondromalacia patella and 16% had lesions of unknown aetiology. 53% had a medial femoral condyle lesion, 25% patella, 18% lateral femoral condyle, 3% trochlea and there was one defect of the lateral tibial plateau.

The mean duration of symptoms was 7. 2 years and the average number of previous operations (excluding arthroscopies) was 1. 5. Only 6 patients had no prior surgical interventions to the affected knee. The mean follow-up was 1. 7 years.

Patients were evaluated using Modified Cincinnati and Stanmore Functional rating systems, visual analogue scores and clinical assessment. Arthroscopy and biopsy was performed at one year and repair assessed with the International Cartilage Repair Society grading system.

Clinical results at one year showed 70% of mosaic-plasty patients and 87% of ACI patients had a good or excellent result. Arthroscopy at one year demonstrated more complete healing in ACI patients. Eleven (26%) of the mosaicplasty group subsequently failed clinically and arthroscopically, with peak failure at 2 years.

At one year follow-up, both techniques of articular cartilage repair can be useful in selected patients. ACI is preferred for lesions of the patella. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the durability of articular cartilage repair using these methods, in particular mosaicplasty which showed signs of progressive failure over 2 years.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom