Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue SUPP_II, 108.  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, T R C
Right arrow Articles by Hatton, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davis, T R C
Right arrow Articles by Hatton, M

British Orthopaedic Association

Birmingham – 12–14 September, 2001

President – Professor Charles Galasko

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED STUDY OF FIXATION OF OBLIQUE AND SPIRAL SHAFT FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL PHALANX

T R C Davis; T C Horton; and M Hatton

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queens Medical Centre Nottingham NG7 2OH

Displaced spiral and oblique fractures of the proximal phalanx are unstable and non-operative treatment frequently results in malunion. Such fractures are therefore treated operatively. No previous study has compared the two common techniques used.

Patients with an isolated spiral or oblique fracture of the proximal phalanx were prospectively randomised into two groups. One was treated by closed reduction and Kirschner wire fixation and the second treated by open reduction and lag screw fixation. An independent observer assessed function, pain, movement, grip strength and intrinsic muscle function. X-rays were assessed for malunion.

32 patients entered the study. At follow-up (mean 40 months) there were 15 in the Kirschner wire and 13 in the lag screw group. All returned to their normal employment and 18 described a full functional recovery. There was no significant difference in the functional recovery rates (Fischer exact test p=0. 3) or in pain scores for the two groups (median 0 for both). Radiographs showed similar rates of malunion and there was no statistically significant difference in range of movement or grip strengths.

This prospective randomised study has shown no significant difference in outcome for the two techniques. We would recommend that surgeons should choose the method with which they are most familiar and competent, or the technique that utilises the least health care resources.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General