Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue SUPP_II, 108.  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, W J
Right arrow Articles by Lavy, C B D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, W J
Right arrow Articles by Lavy, C B D

British Orthopaedic Association


Birmingham – 12–14 September, 2001

President – Professor Charles Galasko


FRACTURES AROUND THE DISTAL FEMORAL GROWTH PLATE

W J Harrison; C P Lewis; and C B D Lavy

11 Ilford Road, Jesmond, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 3NX

25 cases of closed fractures around the distal femoral growth plate were analysed prospectively over a one-year period. There were 22 males and 3 females. Mean age was 16 years (range 7 to 22).

According to the classification of Salter and Harris there were 6 cases (24%) of type 1 fracture, 12 (48%) type 2 fractures, 3 (12%) type 3, and 4 (16%) type 4. Mechanism of injury was football in 13 (59%), simple fall in 4 (18%), crush in 2 (9%), RTA in 2 (9%), and fall from height in 1 (5%); in 3, the mechanism was not recorded. The average time from injury to hospital admission was 5 days (range 0 to 17 days).

Management was conservative in 4 and operative in 21. The medial parapatellar approach was used in 16. Post-surgically plaster cylinders were used for a mean of 3 weeks (range 0 to 6 weeks). No patient received physiotherapy.

In the operative cases, sepsis was observed in 1 case (5%). This was a crash injury with a skin ulcer that became septic postoperatively and later required knee fusion.

Of the remaining 20 operative cases, 17 cases were reviewed, 4 to one year, 9 to six months, and 4 to three months. There were no cases of deformity, nor wound complications. Those reviewed at one year had an excellent range of movement averaging 0 to 117 degrees (range 0–100 to 0–140). At six months the average range of movement was 1–98 degrees (range 5–70 to 0–140) and at three months 2–62 degrees (range 10–50 to 0–95).

In conclusion, we believe that these difficult fractures should usually be managed operatively where expertise allows. Preliminary results suggest that the medial parapatellar approach provides excellent access but may inhibit initial rehabilitation.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General