Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue SUPP_II, 97.  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cutler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Blohm, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cutler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Blohm, J.

British Orthopaedic Association


Birmingham – 12–14 September, 2001

President – Professor Charles Galasko


K-WIRE FIXATION OF DISTAL RADIAL FRACTURE: WHAT IS THE BEST CONFIGURATION?

L. Cutler; D. Boot; and J. Blohm

1 Fairfield Gardens, Stockton Heath, Warrington WA4 2BY

To ascertain the optimum number, thickness and configuration of K-wires needed to prevent displacement of distal radial fractures.

Synthetic and cadaver bones were used. A transverse osteotomy was performed 1. 5 cm proximal to the articular surface of the distal radius. Different numbers and configurations of 1. 1mm or 1. 6mm K-wires were used to hold the bone reduced. Dorsoradial and distraction forces were applied using a tensiometer. The endpoint was a displacement of 3mm at the osteotomy site.

We demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the force required to displace the osteotomy site a) when using thicker wires and b) when using three crossed wires compared with two wires either crossed or parallel.

When balancing ease of insertion with maximum stability, we would recommend two parallel 1. 6mm wires inserted through the radial styloid process, with 1 wire inserted from the dorsoulnar corner of the radius crossing at approximately 90 degrees. All wires should pass into the opposite cortex. This configuration resisted forces of over 300 Newtons and there was little benefit in using additional wires.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General