Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 85-B, Issue SUPP_II, 98.  
Copyright © 2003 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goel, A
Right arrow Articles by Sangwan, S S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goel, A
Right arrow Articles by Sangwan, S S

British Orthopaedic Association


Birmingham – 12–14 September, 2001

President – Professor Charles Galasko


TREATMENT OF TIBIAL NON-UNION WITH PERCUTANEOUS BONE MARROW GRAFTING

A Goel; A Ali; and S S Sangwan

33 Irene Road, Liverpool LI6 8NS

Stabilization and bone grafting are the basic principles in the treatment of fracture non-union, however, infection is always a concern. Percutaneous bone marrow grafting has been suggested as an alternative, which provides a source of osteogenic cells with osteoinductive effect.

This prospective study evaluates the efficacy of percutanous bone marrow grafting in patients with tibial non-union while on the waiting list for open surgical procedures. 21 adult patients with established tibial non-union were recruited. The average age of fracture non-union was 12 months (range 6–36). Infected cases, deformed non-unions and gap non-unions were excluded. Eleven were hypertrophic and ten atrophic type of non-union.

Under local anaesthesia, bone marrow was aspirated from the iliac crests using a 16 G sternal puncture needle. 3–5ml marrow was aspirated and injected immediately into and about the non-union site. Subsequent aspirations were performed 1 cm posterior to the previous site until a maximum of 15 ml marrow was injected. Patients were immobilised in a plaster cast. Radiographs were repeated at 6 weeks interval. A second injection was repeated at 6 weeks if there was no evidence of callus formation.

The procedure was considered a failure, if there was no union at six weeks following the third injection. Bone marrow could not be aspirated in one patient. 19 patients were followed up clinically and radiologically until there was definite bone union or failure.

Bone union was achieved in 15 patients out of 20 (75%), with an average time to union following the first injection 14 weeks (range 6–22 ). Two of the patients needed only one injection, nine needed two injections, and four patients needed three injections to unite. 4 patients (20%) showed no evidence of union.

There were no complications at the donor or recipient site.

We conclude that percutanous bone marrow grafting is a safe, simple, and reliable method of treating tibial non-union with minimal deformity.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General