Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 87-B, Issue SUPP_II, 202.  
Copyright © 2005 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sciarretta, F.V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Falez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sciarretta, F.V.

Societá Italiana di Ortopedia e Traumatologia


Naples – October 24–28, 2004

President – Prof. Giuseppe Guida


TREATMENT OF OSTEOCHONDRAL SYMPTOMATIC DEFECTS OF THE KNEE WITH SALUCARTILAGE

F. Falez; and F.V. Sciarretta*

Ospedale Santo Spirito, Rome, Italy. * Ospedale Civile di Velletri, Rome, Italy.

Although various treatment options are available, which include shaving, microfractures, abrasion arthroplasty osteochondral allografts and autografts, chondrocyte grafts and unicondylar prostheses, symptomatic articular cartilage defects represent a therapeutic challenge.

Since November 2002, as a non-biological answer to the problem, we started using synthetic cartilage implants made of polyvinyl alcohol- hydrogel (PVA – H) (SaluCartilage). This is a transparent synthetic polymer with a molecular weight of 308,000 daltons and 20% of water content, available in cylindrical shape of various diameters. Following the second part of the OATS technique, under arthroscopic control and by mini-arthrotomy, or completely arthroscopically assisted, the cylindrical implant is inserted, using press-fit technique, into previously punched out and dilatated osteochondral defects.

Our patients, whose mean age was 56 years (range 48–68 years) have been post-operatively reviewed clinically and by serial MRI exams. Patients showed significant improvement over pre-operative values in the IKDC score, with an average increase of 20 points. Follow-up MRI images revealed a normal healing process, without signs of osteolysis or wear.

As complications we had one case of implant dislocation 1 year after surgery and one case of progressive loosening due to osteoarthritic disease, both of which have required a knee prosthesis.

Our experience has led us to emphasise the use of this type of treatment only in cases that fullfil precise indications: (a) Third and fourth degree chondral or osteochondral symptomatic defects; (b) focal unicompartmental defects with 15 mm maximum extent; (c) patient’s age limited from fourth to seventh decade of life; and (d) absence of angular deformities or articular instabilities.

The synthetic cartilage resurfacing technique has the advantages of no donor defect, one short-step surgical procedure, immediate weight-bearing and no extensive rehabilitation programme. Early results of first 15 patients are being presented, expecting a longer observation follow-up study.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General