Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 88-B, Issue SUPP_II, 211.  
Copyright © 2006 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, K
Right arrow Articles by Hirose, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, K
Right arrow Articles by Hirose, T.

European Rheumatoid Arthritis Surgical Society


Pfäffikon, Switzerland – 25–27 May, 2006

President – Beat R. Simmen


S33 SEQUENTIAL BILATERAL TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: COMPARISON WITH STAGED BILATERAL AND UNILATERAL TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

MasudaK ; MoriT ; JujiT ; MarutaniR ; and HiroseT.

Sagamihara

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sequential bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in comparison with staged bilateral and unilateral TKA.

Patients and Methods: Between July 2000 and June 2005, 340 TKA were performed in our department. We investigated retrospectively the clinical data of each patient, including the peri-operative data such as the surgical time, the amount of haemorrhage and postoperative adverse events. We also examined the clinical outcome before and after bilateral TKA by using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) evaluation chart of knee joint function (JOA score).

Results: We have done sequential bilateral TKA for 60 knees of 30 patients (group A), staged bilateral TKA for 26 knees of 13 patients (group B) and unilateral TKA for 254 knees (group C). Before TKA, the mean JOA score were 44.9, 40.1, 46.4 points, and the mean range of motion of affected knees were 14.6–113.6°, 27.9–89.6°, 14.1–116.9° in group A, B and C, respectively, indicating that group B included more severe cases. Whereas the mean surgical time were 136.4, 158.4, 154.3 minutes, the mean amount of peri-operative haemorrhage were 414.6, 273.4, 277.7 ml in group A, B and C, respectively. Although we experienced 1 case with symptomatic pulmonary embolism in group A, which was successfully treated, there was none of cases with death within 1 month of surgery or early-phase infection. The JOA score at final follow-up (the mean follow-up period was 1 year and 8 months) were 91.1 and 86.9 points in group A and B, respectively, showing good results in both groups.

Conclusion: In short-term data, sequential bilateral TKA was successfully performed and beneficial approach to patients with RA. The intensive pre- and post-operative management could be essential for good clinical outcome. Further improvement should be needed to perform this procedure more safely and prevent complications, especially serious cardiopulmonary events.

Correspondence should be addressed to ERASS Office, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, CH-8008 ZURICH, Switzerland.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General