This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jafri, A. Articles by Muller, S.D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Jafri, A. Articles by Muller, S.D.

OPTIMAL PROSTHESIS TEMPERATURE IN CEMENTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Wansbeck Hospital, Ashington, Northumberland

Introduction: Aseptic loosening is the commonest complication of cemented total hip arthroplasy. Gaseous voids within the cement mantle are thought to act as stress concentrators and points of origin and preferential fracture propagation at the cement stem interface. Assuming a bone tempereature of 37°C, Bishop recommended heating the prosthesis to 44°C, thereby effecting a reduction in cement-prosthesis interface porosity.

The aim of this study was to (I) determine the intra-operative temperature of the femoral cancellous bed prior to insertion of prosthesis, (II) to investigate whether the magnitude of the temperature gradient effects interface porosity (III) to develop clinically relevant recommendations.

Materials and Methods: (I) The intra-operative determination of femoral cancellous boney bed temperature. Sterile, single use thermocouples (Mon-a-therm) were used to record interface temperature in six patients, after canal preparation and lavage. (II) A simulated femoral model was designed consisting of a waterbath, set at temperature determined by (I) with an inner water-tight chamber formed by 19mm diameter polyethylene tubing. Cement (Palacos) was non-vacuum mixed (to exaggerate porosity) for 1 minute and injected in a retrograde manner into the inner tube at 3 minutes. Femoral stems (Exeter) were pre-heated in a second waterbath to 18, 32,35,37,40,44°C, were thoroughly dried and lowered into the inner tube by a Lloyd universal testing machine via a custom jig. The cement was left to polymerise.

The cement mantle was sectioned transversely, then longitudinally to expose the cement-prosthesis interface. This was stained with acrylic dye to facilitate image analysis. Three mantles for each temperature were produced.

Results: (I) The mean femoral canal temperature was 32.3°C, (II) the effect of stem temperature on interface porosity is shown in fig1.

Conclusions: Bone temperature is 32°C after canal preparation using contemporary cementing techniques. Heating to 35°C reduces interface porosity, heating to 40°C is optimal.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary BORS, University Dept of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.