This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hing, C.B. Articles by Donell, S.T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hing, C.B. Articles by Donell, S.T.

A COMPARISON OF THE BONY MORPHOLOGY OF THE DISTAL FEMUR BETWEEN PATIENTS WITH PATELLOFEMORAL INSTABILITY AND NORMAL CONTROLS

Institute of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UY

Introduction: Patellofemoral instability (PFI) is a disabling condition that occurs in adolescence. Recurrence after patellar dislocation has been reported in 2–50% of cases. This study aimed to compare the shape of the distal femur in PFI to a normal cohort.

Method: 108 CT scans from 54 subjects with PFI were compared to 197 CT scans from 102 normal subjects. Outlines of the trochlear groove and lateral condyle were extracted from CT scans using Interactive Data Language version 5.0 image manipulation software. The shapes were aligned using a modified Procrustes analysis and interpolation performed with a basic cubic spline. A statistical method from the field of functional data analysis was used to quantify shape. A discriminant analysis was then used to provide a tool for deciding which patients had abnormal grooves thus improving patient selection for trochleoplasty.

Results: Mathematical quantification showed a significant difference at the 0.001 level using an independent t-test between the normal and PFI groups for the shape of the trochlear groove with PFI knees having a more complex shape than normal. The second largest source of variation is in the position of the trochlear groove minimum with respect to the coronal plane together with variation in the shape of the medial condyle. The trochlear groove is situated more medially, with a shallower medial condyle, in PFI. In contrast the trochlear groove is situated more laterally, with a more prominent medial condyle in normal knees. Analysis of shape of the lateral condyle showed that in PFI, it is shorter and broader.

Conclusion: Principal components analysis can be used to quantify the variation in shape of the distal femur and allow a discriminant function analysis to be performed comparing PFI knees to normal knees. This quantification of shape can be applied to diagnosis of instability, operative planning for trochleoplasty and implant design.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary BORS, University Dept of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.