This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Aldinger, P.R. Articles by Murray, D.W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Aldinger, P.R. Articles by Murray, D.W.

DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF AN IMAGE GUIDED SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM FOR MIS UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

OOEC/NDOS, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, OX3 7LD

Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) presents challenges in achieving alignment for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Aim: Development and assessment of an image guidance system for MIS implanted Oxford UKA.

Methods: The Surgetics platform which uses intra-operative data acquisition was chosen as the base system. Software was developed to determine height of tibial cut, image guidance of saws, alignment of components and assessment of ligament tension. The accuracy of component placement was assessed in vitro using matched pairs of knees randomised into navigated (NAV n=10) and standard manual (MAN n=10) procedures; standardised postoperative A-P and lateral radiographs were used. Pre and post-operative kinematics were assessed (NAV n=6, MAN n=7). The changes postoperatively over knee flexion and extension were calculated for tibiofemoral rotation (ROT) and ab/adduction (ABD).

Results: Accurate component placement was achieved with both methods without significant differences. Tibial cut height was more accurately in the NAV group (re-cut rate: NAV 33%, MAN 50%). NAV femoral component placement was as accurate as MAN with intramedullary rod. For the flexing cycle mean ROT was –0.06° (range 6.08° to –3.93°) and mean ABD was –0.04° (range 3.39° to –5.72°). There were no observable differences between the NAV and MAN kinematics. Overall, no observable differences were found between pre and post-operative kinematics.

Conclusions: Image guidance produces accurate placement through MIS approach and reduces the amount of tibial bone resection.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary BORS, University Dept of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.