Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue SUPP_I, 1.  
Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raman, R
Right arrow Articles by Giannoudis, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Raman, R
Right arrow Articles by Giannoudis, P.

British Orthopaedic Association


Birmingham, England: 17–19 September 2003

President: Professor Paul Gregg


VERTICAL SHEAR FRACTURES OF THE PELVIC RING: TREATMENT PROTOCOL AND LONG TERM FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME – THE ST JAMES’S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL EXPERIENCE

R Raman; SJE Matthews; and PV Giannoudis

St James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF

We have reviewed the patients with vertical shear fractures of the Pelvis and report on our treatment protocol and long-term functional outcome.

Methods: Between January 1993 and January 2002, out of 581 pelvic ring injuries treated in our unit, we identified 31 vertical shear fractures in 29 (4.9%) patients (4 female). Data such as age, sex, aetiology, associated injuries, ISS, resuscitation and transfusion requirements were recorded. ICU/HDU stay, surgical stabilization, urological injuries, systemic complications, neurological injury and mortality were recorded and analysed. Functional outcome was assessed using the following generic tools: EuroQol EQ-5D, SF36v2, SMFA, Majeed score and VAS.

Results: The mean age was 43.5 (16–71). The median ISS was 22 (12–32). Motorcycle accidents were responsible for 27%. Associated injuries included the chest (12 patients), abdomen (8 patients) and extremities (14 patients). Urethral injury was present in 9 and ruptured viscus was identified in 3 patients. Neurologic deficit was present in 9 cases. Posterior ring was stabilized in 3 (0 – 13) days. 6 patients developed systemic complications – ARDS in 4 (12%) patients, sepsis in 2 (6%). The mean follow up was 39 (12–101) months. Functional outcome using the Majeed score revealed that one-third of the patients were fair. SF-36 (physical and mental scores) and EQ 5-score revealed that one-third of the patients were fair. SF-36 (physical and mental scores) and EQ 5-score revealed that one-third of the patients were fair. SF-36 (physical and mental scores) and EQ 5- D revealed a moderate functional outcome. The SMFA and the visual analogue score also revealed similar outcomes.

Conclusion: Prompt resuscitation and early temporarily stabilization of the pelvic ring is essential. Sound reconstruction of the pelvic ring is not always associated with good results, probably due to the extensive pelvic floor trauma seen in this series of patients. Younger individuals seem to have a relatively better outcome when compared to the older age group.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Tim Briggs. (Editoral Secretary 2003/4) Correspondence should be addressed to him at Lane Farm, Chapel Lane, Totternhoe, Dunstable, Bedfordshire LU6 2BZ, United Kingdom






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General