Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue SUPP_I, 10.  
Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cutts, S
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cutts, S
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R

British Orthopaedic Association


Birmingham, England: 17–19 September 2003

President: Professor Paul Gregg


EARLY FAILURE MODALITIES IN HIP RESURFACING

S Cutts; A Datta; A Khalid; T Lawrence; and R Habib

Heartlands and Solihull Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham B9 5SS

Between January 1996 and July 2002, 60 patients (65 hips) were treated in our unit by 5 consultant surgeons using the Corin Cobalt-Chrome metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. 41 procedures were performed on male patients and 24 female.

All 65 cases used the Cormet Hip resurfacing (Corin, UK). Of these, 12 cases (18.5%) have required revision for mechanical failure. 5 of these patients were male and 7 female. The time to failure was defined as the interval between the date of primary and the date of revision surgery. The mean time to failure was 10.2 months (range 48 hours to 53 months). 8 out of 12 patients required revision within 6 months of the primary procedure. The mean age at the time of revision was 56 years (range 22–71 years).

The commonest mechanism of failure in our series is fractured neck of femur and 4 out of the 6 fractured neck of femur occurred in females over the age of 60. Only 12 of our primary hip resurfacings were women over 60 with the result that 33% of this group were complicated by fractured neck of femur.

In 4 cases, the indication for revision was acetabular loosening. One patient underwent revision surgery for chronic pain of unknown aetiology and one developed progressive avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Our early results suggest that the procedure is operator-dependent and associated with a steep learning curve. The procedure would appear to be contraindicated in women over 60 and others at risk of osteoporosis.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Tim Briggs. (Editoral Secretary 2003/4) Correspondence should be addressed to him at Lane Farm, Chapel Lane, Totternhoe, Dunstable, Bedfordshire LU6 2BZ, United Kingdom






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General