Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue SUPP_II, 211.  
Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, S
Right arrow Articles by Broome, G.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, S
Right arrow Articles by Broome, G.

British Elbow and Shoulder Society: PODIUM PRESENTATIONS - ELBOW


Cambridge, England: 6–8 July 2005

President: Roger Emery


PATIENT VALIDATION RESULTS FOR OPEN RELEASE OF THE COMMON EXTENSOR ORIGIN IN THE FAILED NON OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF TENNIS ELBOW

S Thomas; and GH Broome

Department of Orthopaedics, Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, Cumbria. UK

Aim: To assess the outcome of open release of the common extensor origin in the management of tennis elbow after the failure of non operative treatment methods.

Methods: 18 patients (24 elbows) between the age group of 38 to 59 who underwent open release of the common extensor origin by the same team after a mean waiting time of 23 months from the onset of pain and a trial of failed non operative methods like analgesics/nsaids, physiotherapy, local steroid injections were contacted and asked to score the effectiveness of surgery after a gap of six months. Since the predominant troubling symptom for all patients was pain they were asked to score the pain relief correlating with the surgery.

Results: In 15 patients (83%) excellent pain relief (defined as an 8 or more out of 10 improvement) was achieved and they regained normal use of the limb. One patient (5%) had moderate improvement (score between 6 and 7 out of 10) and two further (11%) patients gained minimal benefit with persistent symptoms (score 5 out of 10). None of the patients suffered deterioration as a result of surgery.

Conclusion: This study proves that despite new advances in the treatment of tennis elbow, release of the extensor origin by the open method which is a simple and economical day case procedure, still remains an excellent option in cases where trial of non operative management has failed.

Correspondence should be addressed to The Secretary, British Elbow and Shoulder Society, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General