Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue SUPP_II, 213.  
Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wies, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Speed, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wies, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Speed, C.

British Elbow and Shoulder Society: PODIUM PRESENTATIONS - SHOULDER


Cambridge, England: 6–8 July 2005

President: Roger Emery


A RANDOMISED PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY FOR ROTATOR CUFF TENDINOPATHIES

WiesJoshua T. 1; HumphreysHelen 1; LathamMelanie 2; EnricoPetra 2; ViljoenTherese 2; HazlemanBrian 1; and SpeedCathy 1

1 Rheumatology Research Unit, Addenbrookes NHS Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.2 Outpatient Physiotherapy Department, Addenbrookes NHS Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of physiotherapy approaches to treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathies (RCT). Ninety shoulders were randomised in the study. A power calculation performed demonstrated using a factorial study design, 85 shoulders would be needed for 80% power at 95% confidence. All participants gave informed consent and ethical approval was granted by the Cambridge LREC. The primary outcome measure was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Participants were blinded to their allocation and were randomised to one of four groups: Therapeutic Exercise(T), Manual Therapy(M), combined T/M (X), or Placebo(P). Participants were seen for two baseline assessments with a 4-week interval and then randomised. Final assessments were performed one week after the last session. The analysis involved a comparison between groups in change from baseline SPADI using ANCOVA adjusting for baseline scores. This involved testing for any interaction between M and T, and subsequently testing for main effects of M and T. Adjusted baseline and final SPADI scores (SD) by group were: X 41.6(15.4), 21.1(20.8); T 47.6(19.3), 26.3(14.7); M 44.1(17.9), 33.1(23.3); and P 39.5(24.7), 36.6(30.6). The main effects (with Significance, Standard Error and Confidence Interval) by group were: Baseline=0.686 (SE=0.104;CI=0.479,0.892); T=–13.347 (p=0.002;SE=4.091;CI=–21.479,–5.215); X=5.479 (p=0.510;SE=8.284; CI=–10.991,21.950); M=–4.126 (p=0.314;SE=4.077;CI=–12.230,3.978). A statistically significant reduction in SPADI was observed for the T group alone. There was no significant interaction effect with the addition of manual therapy and the M group did not improve significantly. It appears that best practice for treatment of RCT should centre around therapeutic exercise.

Correspondence should be addressed to The Secretary, British Elbow and Shoulder Society, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General