This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Roberts, C. Articles by De Beer, J PubMed Articles by Roberts, C. Articles by De Beer, J

THE HISTOPATHOLOGY OF GLENOID BONE LESIONS AND ITS RELEVANCE TO SURGERY FOR GLENOHUMERAL INSTABILITY

University of Stellenbosch and Cape Shoulder Institute

The management of bony lesions associated with glenohumeral instability has been open to debate. Invariably a significant period of time elapses between injury and surgery during which the bony fragment may atrophy and reduce both in size and in quality. Histomorphometric bone analyses were prospectively performed on the glenoid bone fragments harvested during the modified Latarjet operation. The main purpose of the study was to assess the viability of the bone. Biopsies were obtained from 21 patients that had given informed consent. Median age was 21 years (range 16–50). All were male patients. The most important sports identified were rugby (64%) and water sports (surfing, water polo, water skiing, surfing (21%)). Mean glenoid bone loss on CT scan was 17% (range 10–50%). Thirty-three percent had bone loss greater than 20%. Gross morphology of glenolabral fragments identified a single large fragment (11/21); dominant large fragment plus smaller fragments (7/21); multiple fragments (4/21). Single large fragments comprised 52% of the study. Mean volume and mass of bony fragments were 2.18 ml (range 1–3 ml) and 1.64 gms (range 0.43–2.8 g), respectively. Histology of the specimens revealed no bone in three of the 21 specimens. Bony necrosis was present in 8/18 (44%) of the specimens. From a histopathological point of view, reattachment of these devitalized bone fragments by screws or anchors may result in predictable operative failure and recurrent instability. We can therefore not support the practice of "repair" of bony Bankart lesions based on the above findings.

Correspondence should be addressed to The Secretary, British Elbow and Shoulder Society, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.