Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue SUPP_II, 214.  
Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brownlow, H.C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brownlow, H.C.

British Elbow and Shoulder Society: PODIUM PRESENTATIONS - SHOULDER


Cambridge, England: 6–8 July 2005

President: Roger Emery


PAIN AND STIFFNESS IN PARTIAL THICKNESS ROTATOR CUFF TEARS

H.C. Brownlow

Dept of Orthopaedics, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, Berkshire, RG9 4AA

The purpose of this study was to test the null hypothesis that patients with partial thickness rotator cuff tears do not suffer more pain or stiffness than those with full thickness tears. A power study determined that 68 partial thickness tears were required in the study in order to prove a clinically important difference (± = 0.05 and 2 = 0.2). Consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopy and bursoscopy for rotator cuff related problems were assessed using a pain analogue scale and their shoulder movements were measured. Information was gained both pre- and intra-operatively about possibly relevant confounders including age, site size and thickness of tears, and endocrine disorders. Exclusion criteria included glenohumeral arthropathy, frozen shoulder, instability and major traumatic injuries, as well as the inability to understand the pain score. 439 shoulders (428 patients) were included in the study; 216 shoulders had no cuff tear, 95 had partial thickness tears (75 joint side, 1 intrasubstance, 19 bursal side), and 128 shoulders had full thickness tears. There was no significant difference (p<0.05) in the pain scores or range of movement between full and partial thickness tears. Age was the only independent variable to have an effect on pain score.

The null hypothesis has been upheld. This study contradicts the findings of previous research and challenges commonly held assertions on this topic. Neither pain nor stiffness can be used clinically as discriminators between partial and full thickness rotator cuff tears.

Correspondence should be addressed to The Secretary, British Elbow and Shoulder Society, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General