Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 90-B, Issue SUPP_II, 351.  
Copyright © 2008 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, D
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, W A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, D
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, W A.

British Elbow and Shoulder Society: PODIUM PRESENTATIONS - SHOULDER


Edinburgh, Scotland: 31 May–2 June 2006

President: Tim Bunker


EVIDENCE BASED CONSENT FOR SHOULDER & ELBOW SURGERY – IS IT POSSIBLE AND HOW CAN IT BE ACHIEVED?

D Buchanan; M Jeyam; Lars Neumann; and W Angus Wallace

Nottingham Shoulder & Elbow Unit, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK

The NHS Plan (2000) identified the need for change in the way patients are asked to give consent for surgery to make the process more explicit. A new NHS operation consent form was introduced in April 2002 following the Bristol enquiry into deaths associated with Cardiac Surgery.

Methods: We have addressed the obtaining of consent for surgery as an evidence-based exercise. The published literature has been reviewed and we have attempted to accurately quantify the success rates for surgery, complication rates and poor outcomes in order to identify what the likely benefits and risks are for our common operations –

  1. Shoulder – Arthroscopic Sub-Acromial Decompression, Anterior stabilisation, Rotator Cuff repair, excision lateral end of clavicle and Shoulder Arthroplasty.
  2. Elbow – Tennis elbow release, Arthroscopic Debridement, OK Operation and Elbow Replacement We became increasingly aware throughout this exercise that although there were many papers published; collating the relevant evidence based information for patients was either difficult or impossible.

Evidence was therefore been categorised into 4 levels:

  1. National & International published results
  2. Our own results, either published or presented at scientific meetings
  3. Our own results as identified in internal audited outcome studies unpublished
  4. Our opinion of the risks or benefits unsupported by any scientific or published evidence.

Results: We have taken the standard NHS Consent Form and modified it in a printed format to present to the patient a clearer description of the anticipated outcome from their surgery (with percentages). This evidence based consent form was evaluated in a combined prospective and retrospective survey of 60 patients who attended our pre-operative assessment clinic. We will present the results of the survey and demonstrate the standardised Consent Forms.

Conclusions: The majority of the information the patient wished to know was Level 4 evidence!

The abstracts were prepared by Cormac Kelly. Correspondence should be addressed to The Secretary, British Elbow and Shoulder Society, Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General